Forces Reshaping the Process of Management

December 7th, 2011

An understanding of organizational behavior is important to managers, who have the responsibilities of improving organizational effectiveness, the ability of an organization to achieve the goals. A goal is desired future outcome that an organization seeks to achieve. In the last 10 years, the challenges facing managers in effectively utilizing human resources and managing organizational behavior have increased. These challenges stem from changing forces in the technological, global, and social or cultural environments. Organization can obtain a competitive advantage, a way of outperforming other organizations providing similar goods and services. They can pursue any or all of the following goals: increase efficiency, increase quality; increase innovation and creativity; and increase responsiveness to customers.

Organizational efficiency is increased by reducing the amount of resources, such as people or new materials, needed to produce a quality of goods or services. Organizations try to find better ways to utilize and increase the skills and abilities of their workforce. Cross training workers to perform different tasks and finding new ways of organizing workers to use their skills more efficiently improve efficiency. The global competitive challenge facing organizations is to invest in the skills of the workers because better-trained workers make better use of technology. Increased competition has also put pressure on companies to increase the quality of the goods and services they provide. One approach to increasing quality is called Total Quality Management, a technique borrowed from the Japanese. Total Quality Management involves a whole new philosophy of managing behavior in organizations and includes elements like giving workers the responsibility for finding ways to do their job more efficiently and ways to improve quality.

An organization’s ethics are rules, beliefs, and values that outline ways in which managers and workers should behave when confronted with a situation that may help or harm other people inside or outside an organization. Ethical behavior enhances the well-being of individuals, groups, organizations, and the organizational environment. Ethics establish the goals and behaviors appropriate to the organization. Many organizations have the goal of making a profit, to be able to pay workers, suppliers, and shareholders. Ethics specifies what actions an organization should take to make a profit and what limits should be put on organizations and their managers to prevent harm.

The challenges managing a diverse workforce increase as organizations expand their operations internationally. There are several issues that arise in the international arena. First, managers must understand cultural differences to interact with workers and associates in foreign countries. Understanding the differences between national cultures is important in any attempt to manage behavior in global organizations to increase performance.

Second, the management functions of planning, organizing, leading, and controlling become more complex in a global environment. Planning requires coordination between managers in the home and those abroad. Organizing, the allocation of decision-making authority and responsibility between headquarters and the foreign country is a significant function of global managers. Leading requires tailoring their leadership styles to suit differences in the attitudes and values of foreign workers. Controlling involves establishing the evaluation, reward, and promotion policies of the organization and training and developing a globally diverse workforce.

The Long-Term Implications of Transformational Leadership

December 2nd, 2011

The study of transformational leadership theory, from the interview results as well as the research studies, indicates that the theory has various characteristics that necessitate its application in modern-day society. The theory is suitable, as most people agree, with the fact that leaders typically create a vision for the organization. The meaning of leadership, as explained by the theory, coincides with the social conception of the elements that constitute it.

Transformational leadership is also made viable for implementation, mostly due to the fact that it defines leadership as a process that takes place between the leader and the follower. This ensures the participation of both parties in enhancing the performance of an organization. More so, the results have portrayed that transformational leadership is something that combines the techniques of other leadership theories and styles. These include the transactional model that is focused on the attainment of goals. Transformational leadership, in addition to goal achievement, encompasses the exchange of rewards and concern for the needs of followers.

The results also indicated that the leadership theory lays great emphasis on the values and norms of followers. It is clear that transformational leadership seeks to ensure that leaders improve the moral responsibilities of followers. This involves convincing followers to take up challenges, and sacrifice their personal interests, all for the benefit of the company. This feature makes the theory stand out from other perspectives on leadership, as it is based on moral foundation. Additionally, the results indicate that the theory and its application are linked to organizational aspects of productivity, motivation, and job satisfaction.

Transformational leadership has been found to be applicable in organizations, as it provides a unique way of looking at issues. These are prescribed by motivation, ideals, inspiration, and besides concern, creativity and innovation. The theory is applicable in various sections of the organization including: human resources, team building, and decision-making. The aspect of gender was also brought up in the research. This implies that for women, transformational leadership encompasses aspects of work and family balance. This facilitates participation in economic activities. It is also clear that this theory calls for the utilization of ideas (to provide solutions for women), and to create role models for women to emulate.

Controversy and debate have, however, ensued in the application of the theory, as some information is not known or unclear. For instance, the use of the MLQ has been disputed by the view that it may lack structural validity. In using other methods of measurement such as interviews, the results are still disputed, simple based on the fact that a clear distinction among the elements of transformational leadership is difficult to establish. The theory has also been criticized, as it is viewed to perpetuate authoritarian and undemocratic leadership styles.

Transformational leadership has also been pointed out as a cause for development of heroic leadership. It has been viewed as a model that concentrates on the leader at the expense of followers. Critics argue that followers should be encouraged to challenge the views of the leader, as to participate in the process, and improve the overall results. The theory has been disputed by the fact that its principles can be manipulated or abused easily. A leader involved in transforming the values of followers, according to their own vision, may allow for things to take off in questionable directions – such as what happened with Enron.